MJC: Joern makes the case for science-activists. Interested readers may want to look at earlier AgroEcoEntries Neutrality and Bias and More on Advocacy & Bias: Action Ecology, as well as the classic piece, On Advocacy by Environmental Scientists: What, Whether, Why, and How by Michael Nelson and John Vucetich.

Ideas for Sustainability

By Joern Fischer

As Pim Martens and Jan Rotmans pointed out in the previous guest post, the old approach of “just providing the facts” is failing to get the simple message communicated to society that our world is falling apart. No wonder, really. While us scientists might think of ourselves as pretty special, we’re no more special to society as a whole than its businesses, politicians and other lobby groups. We have methods for how we come up with what we believe to be true (arguably, pretty  rigorous methods) — but other groups of people are just as entitled to communicating their points, which they believe to be important. Those points can range from “buy more burgers” to “help needy children”, and from “Vote for Me” to “Pray to Him”. In short: we’re one voice of many out there, and from the perspective of society as a whole (politicians…

View original post 789 more words

About AgroEcoDoc

I'm AgroEcoDoc.
This entry was posted in Conservation, Hopey-Changery, Ideas4Sustainability [blog], Inter- cross- and trans-disciplinarity, Joern Fischer, Solutions, Taking Action. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s